More from Conspiracy

 

ugh

another hour gone

ok, so he thinks a president can just write laws

via executive order

and no one would know

I'm trying to explain someone would know because someone needs to be following those orders

and if it's a big order, more people would notice

and he thinks otherwise

no one would notice

Obama had open borders and no one noticed

so I explained open borders would mean you could freely travel to and from

customs and borders would know

and they would find a sympathetic ear in Fox News

I explained what open borders were, it would be like you could easily travel to idaho and back.

he admitted that it wasn't that open borders, but a different kind of open borders

one where we arrest and process people, then send them to court

so....not open borders.

and we jump around so much

all this started with him being angry at the WEF wanting us to eat bugs. I have no idea

And we ended with Biden wanting WW3 because Russia paid him. "Remember the Russian collusion?" No. "You're pretending but you know!" I remember Trump was accused of it. "Yes!" But he's not Biden. "Who do you think paid for that? The dossier?" Clinton. "Yes." Ok. So, how is that Biden getting paid by Russia? "I'm just saying there are rich powerful people who want war. And they don't care what we want."

And he knows what he's saying is true. "I hear people who were silenced by the news on bitchute." And what they're saying is true? "Well, other people start saying the same thing." So if a bunch of people say the same thing, that makes it true?" "I know you're trying to get me. Not gonna work. Bye. Bye. Bye." He starts walking away, gets to the hallway. Ok, but you know what I said was right. People saying stuff doesn't make it true. "Ok, but that doesn't make them wrong." You're not wrong. Maybe we shouldn't believe everything we read or see on bitchute.

and on and on

oh my god.

He tells me to do my own research. He can't tell me everything. But surely someone who claims to know would be able to say what law he talks about. "They made a law" is vague. "I read it!"

Even a suggestion like maybe he didn't understand the law or misread it gets met with a "No."

No wonder no one in his family likes talking to him. He insists what he's saying is right but can't admit that maybe he knows less than what he thinks

even when you explain how something works, it doesn't deter

"it just works"

He is a literal walking dunning-krueger

It seems like their research is watching some 3 minute tiktok

.

I assume it's 3 minutes. Conspiracy told me the tiktoks can't exceed 3 minutes.

Is that the limit? I wouldn't know. I don't know tiktok

but 3 minutes means you need to condense a lot.

which explains why he cannot explain anything.

Very basic thinking
Obama can open borders and no one will notice
until you point out that surely border guards would know
otherwise, they're still doing their job
ok, they know the world goes along as usual, but also a massive shift happens that no one notices
it works in story telling because it makes for a good story, right
whereas in reality, things would go horrifically wrong

 

Oh, we also talked about Tesla. He said he came up with the idea for converting the kinetic energy from braking to charging up the battery. I told him other people made it work.

"Yeah, but I gave them the idea."

Lots of people had that idea for batteries. But having an idea and actually doing the work to getting it to function are two different things.

"People didn't talk about this until 2013. I told Tesla to do it."

You talked to the people designing the brakes?

"Well. No."

So there's no contact between you and the people who are making it work? So, you didn't come up with that.

"I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with this. Let's leave it at that."

That was the closest I came to getting him to admitting he was wrong.

Wait, did I mention the climate change stuff? Oh, he pretended not to care.

 

“So what if temperatures increase by 1 degree a year. It’s just 1 degree.”

 

I was wowed by this. Because for someone who claimed to be a big picture guy, he sure didn’t think this one through, 1 degree a year Utah going from 100 degree summer, to 110 in a decade and Death Valley temps of 120 in two. I explained to him how awful this would be for us living in Utah.

”Well, that’s why we have free agency. We chose to live here.”

 

So, I asked him if he would live here.

”No, I’d move to colder places.”

 

So heading north?

”South.”

?_?

”To Hawaii or California.”

The liberal states he hates are going to be his haven. So I ask him if that’s the plan, just move everyone to Hawaii?

”No. People have free agency, like I said. They can choose.”

But you understand why having millions of people either move or die might be a slight cause of concern, right?

So he eventually agreed that climate change was a thing but that sometimes things went too far. But he’s terrible when it comes to thinking long-term. Very poor big picture thinking. But that’s what happens when you assume something small doesn’t matter. The details matter, because that’s how things work. Surely someone working in an Amazon Warehouse understands that. But he doesn’t.



P.S. He came home and apologized to me for our argument. I told him we were just talking. No need to apologize. He said he had to take off to do Door Dash. He's behind on rent so he needs the money. I sympathized with him. This is the first time he admitted money troubles to me. All the other times I just overheard and told you. But, again, another example of him not thinking things through. Struggling to afford $400 today but his plan for 120 degree Utah is to move to a place with colder weather with I guess some money he magically earns a lot of between now and then, I guess.

I think I might understand what he's talking about when he mentioned immigration. So, our immigration courts are backed up. So Obama just kept rotating the non-violent offenders back and moved other forward.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deferred_Action_for_Childhood_Arrivals

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals

en.wikipedia.org

This is what he most likely is talking about. But notice the timeline. It got rescinded by Trump, reinstated by Biden. This isn't Open Borders. Because that would mean people get in, hassle free. Again, like I said, as easy as you traveling to Idaho. No one's stopping you, no one asks for papers. You're free to buy a home and work there, hassle-free. That is open borders. This isn't. This isn't even a new law, it's an executive action. The law says that they need to go to court, but there's no timeline on it. So, people are essentially kept in limbo. Awful but not as bad as being sent back home. But this is the extent of the power until the law is repealed or replaced. Not "creates new laws".

I brought up any president trying to create a new law would be challenged in court immediately.

"Yeah, but it takes an average of 10 years to get to the Supreme Court. By that time, the president is gone."

Yeah, if our system worked like that, it would be pretty dumb. But the Supreme Court decides what they want to handle and they expedite situations involving the president like this. It's how Biden's vaccine mandate got overturned and we didn't have to wait until 2030 for that.

When I bring up he doesn't understand how things work, he insists he does.

"I took civics in high school. I know how things work."

That's it. That's his entire knowledge of how things work. A single class he took over 2 decades ago and now he's the expert on exactly how the government functions on every single level. Presidents can make new laws and secretly so no one notices. Don't try and bring up that if no one knows, then who is following the order? Clearly the people involved at each level have to know. This isn't even a civics thing, this is a logic thing.